Find out more at btsub.sg/btdeal
You are here
Trump could privatise nation's air traffic controllers
[WASHINGTON] The chances that the federal government could hand off the US air traffic control system to private management are increasing, say advocates who report they are getting supportive feedback from President-elect Donald Trump and his team.
US Republican Bill Shuster, who chairs the House of Representatives Transportation Committee, has met with Trump and incoming Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao to make his case for moving the nation's 14,500 air traffic controllers and their mission out of government control and into a non-profit organisation.
Mr Shuster and other privatisation advocates argue that spinning off air traffic control into a non-government entity would allow for a more efficient system and rapid, cost-effective improvements of technology, in part by avoiding the government procurement process.
The National Air Traffic Controllers Association, the union that represents controllers, came out in favour of Mr Shuster's legislation earlier this year.
But he has run into bipartisan opposition in both the House and the Senate and push back from some of the nation's airlines. Opponents say the US system is so large that privatisation would not save money, would drive up ticket costs and could create a national security risk.
The landscape might change once Mr Trump, who campaigned on improving the nation's infrastructure, occupies the White House on Jan 20.
Apart from Mr Shuster, officials and lobbyists who work in infrastructure construction say the idea of privatising air traffic controllers as part of an infrastructure bill is gaining steam, especially among those who are concerned that Congress will not be able to pass a separate sweeping transportation bill.
Congress has been averse to spending money, but privatising air traffic control systems would shift the cost of upgrades from tax coffers to air travelers, the kind of move that makes lawmakers view it as free instead of an increase in federal spending.
"I've had some conversations with Trump transition folks and they seemed very interested in putting this in their larger infrastructure bill," Mr Shuster said.
The air traffic control system is in need of expensive upgrades, including the multi-billion dollar implementation of"NextGen," a system that would utilise GPS to direct aircraft instead of the outdated use of radar.
In Mr Shuster's vision, the move would not enrich any particular company as air traffic control would be overseen by a nonprofit that reinvest any profits back into infrastructure improvements.
Mr Shuster first broached the subject with Mr Trump two years ago, he said, and the two have discussed it several additional times. He met with Ms Chao last week.
It could take a strong presidential push for the privatisation effort. Earlier this year, it failed to get even enough support from Republican members for a vote on the House floor.
In February, Delta released a study arguing that privatisation would cost air travelers more and would not achieve any savings.
Many air traffic controller operations are funded through ticket taxes - which are levied on every flight. Historically, those taxes have been kept low by the government's aversion to raising rates. But should the ticket tax become the control of an outside board, opponents are concerned that could drive up ticket prices.