You are here

Redacted Mueller report set for release 'within a week'

lwx_Bill Barr_100419_40.jpg
Attorney General Bill Barr repeated his refusal however to give Congress the full, unaltered report - including crucial secret testimony - despite the threat of a subpoena.

[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump's justice chief said on Tuesday his review of the two-year Russian meddling investigation is on schedule and a redacted version of the report could be released by next week.

Attorney General Bill Barr repeated his refusal however to give Congress the full, unaltered report - including crucial secret testimony - despite the threat of a subpoena.

In his first public remarks since declaring President Donald Trump cleared of conspiracy to collude with Russia and obstruction of justice, Mr Barr said his office was still editing out sensitive materials in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's final report.

Mr Barr said Mr Mueller and his team did not review his March 24 summary of the long-awaited report's conclusions, which allowed Mr Trump to declare "complete and total exoneration."

sentifi.com

Market voices on:

Since then US media has reported that some of Mr Mueller's staff took issue with Mr Barr's conclusions clearing Trump.

Mr Barr has come under heavy pressure to hand over the entire 400-page report to Congress, where Democrats are seeking to find if there was evidence of impeachable wrongdoing by the president.

"Within a week I will be in a position to release the report to the public," Mr Barr told the House Appropriations Committee.

He made clear though that he was not prepared to release the entire report to either the public or Congress.

"I don't intend at this stage to send the full unredacted report to the committee," he said, referring to the House Judiciary Committee, which last week threatened the attorney general with a subpoena.

POTENTIALLY DAMNINGĀ 

Mr Barr said his staff were in the process of editing out "sensitive" details - grand jury testimony, intelligence, information involving ongoing investigations and information on "peripheral" subjects of the investigation who have not been charged.

That includes the most crucial and potentially damning information Democrats seek: testimony and documents from Mr Mueller's grand jury, a panel of citizens convened to develop and hear the evidence and depose key witnesses behind closed doors.

Grand jury evidence is usually kept secret unless a prosecutor ultimately decides to level charges in the case, and Mr Barr has maintained that the law prevents him from releasing it.

Democrats argue that Congress, in its constitutional responsibility to enforce the law against the president, has the right to review any evidence against him of wrongdoing, even that of a grand jury.

Democratic Representative Jerry Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said Mr Barr must had over the document.

"Congress is - as a matter of law - entitled to each of the categories AG Barr proposed to redact from the Special Counsel's report," Mr Nadler said Tuesday.

"Full release of the report to Congress is consistent with both congressional intent and the interests of the American public."

"We still have not heard from the attorney general," he added.

MORE QUESTIONS

Mr Barr's March 24 four-page summary raised as many questions as it resolved.

He said that Mr Mueller's investigation found no evidence of conspiracy by the Trump campaign to collude with Russians during the 2016 presidential election.

He also said Mr Mueller "did not draw a conclusion - one way or the other" on whether Mr Trump's actions were considered to be obstruction, ruling that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the president had committed a crime.

But one quote from Mr Mueller's conclusions that Mr Barr revealed suggested a different view on obstruction.

The special counsel wrote that "while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

Since then media reports cite unnamed Mueller staff saying that Mr Barr downplayed the obstruction evidence they presented.

Mr Barr's own stance before he was chosen by Mr Trump to be attorney general - that Mr Mueller had no legal grounds to investigate Mr Trump for obstruction - has also drawn questions about how he reached his conclusion.

AFP