You are here
Trump's full-spectrum corruption: there's more to come
THERE'S never been any confusion about the character defects of Donald Trump. The question has always been just how far he would go and whether other individuals and institutions would stand up to him or become complicit in his corruption.
When I first took to these pages three summers ago to write about him, I warned my fellow Republicans to just say no both to him and his candidacy. One of my concerns was that if he were to succeed, he would redefine the Republican Party in his image.
That's already happened in areas like free trade, free markets and the size of government; in attitudes toward ethnic nationalism and white identity politics; in America's commitment to its traditional allies, in how Republicans view Russia and in their willingness to call out leaders of evil governments like North Korea rather than lavish praise on them. But in no area has the President more fundamentally changed the Republican Party than in its attitude toward ethics and political leadership.
For decades, Republicans, and especially conservative Republicans, insisted that character counted in public life. They were particularly vocal about this during the Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky scandal, arguing against "compartmentalisation" - by which they meant overlooking moral turpitude in the Oval Office because you agree with the president's policy agenda or because the economy is strong.
Senator Lindsey Graham, then in the House, went so far as to argue that "impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honour and integrity to the office".
All that has changed with Mr Trump as president. For Republicans, honour and integrity are now passé. We saw it again last week when the president's long-time lawyer Michael Cohen implicated the President in criminal activity in court, while his former campaign chairman was convicted in another courtroom on financial fraud charges. Most Republicans in Congress were either silent or came to Mr Trump's defence, which is how this tiresome drama now plays itself out.
It is a stunning turnabout. A party that once spoke with urgency and apparent conviction about the importance of ethical leadership - fidelity, honesty, honour, decency, good manners, setting a good example - has hitched its wagon to the most thoroughly and comprehensively corrupt individual who has ever been elected president. Some of the men who have been elected president have been unscrupulous in certain areas - infidelity, lying, dirty tricks, financial misdeeds - but we've never before had the full-spectrum corruption we see in the life of Donald Trump.
For many Republicans, this reality still hasn't broken through. But facts that don't penetrate the walls of an ideological silo are facts nonetheless. And the moral indictment against him is obvious and overwhelming.
Corruption has been evident in his private and public life, in how he has treated his wives, in his business dealings and scams, in his pathological lying and cruelty, in his bullying and shamelessness, in his conspiracy-mongering and appeals to the darkest impulses of Americans. Mr Trump's corruptions are ingrained, the result of a lifetime of habits. It was delusional to think he would change for the better once he became president.
Some of us who have been life-long Republicans and previously served in Republican administrations held out a faint hope that our party would at some point say "Enough!" and then break with him in large numbers. No such luck.
Mr Trump's corruptions have therefore become theirs. So far there's been no bottom, and there may never be. It's quite possible this should have been obvious to me much sooner than it was, that I was blinded to certain realities I should have recognised.
In any case, the Republican Party's as-yet unbreakable attachment to him is coming at quite a cost. There is the rank hypocrisy, the squandered ability to venerate public character or criticise Democrats who lack it, and the damage to the white Evangelical movement, which has for the most part enthusiastically rallied to him and as a result has been largely discredited. There is also likely to be an electoral price to pay in November.
But the greatest damage is being done to our civic culture and our politics. Mr Trump and the Republican Party are right now the chief emblem of corruption and cynicism in American political life, of an ethic of might makes right. Dehumanising others is fashionable and truth is relative. They are stripping politics of its high purpose and nobility.
That's not all politics is; self-interest is always a factor. But if politics is only about power unbounded by morality - if it's simply about rulers governing by the law of the jungle, about a prince acting like a beast, in the words of Machiavelli - then the whole enterprise will collapse. We have to distinguish between imperfect leaders and corrupt ones, and we need the vocabulary to do so.
A warning to my Republican friends: The worst is yet to come. Thanks to the work of Robert Mueller - a distinguished public servant, not the leader of a "group of Angry Democrat Thugs" - we are going to discover deeper and deeper layers to Mr Trump's corruption. When we do, I expect he will unravel further as he feels more cornered, more desperate, more enraged; his behaviour will become ever more erratic, disordered and crazed.
Most Republicans, having thrown their MAGA hats over the Trump wall, will stay with him until the end. Was a tax cut, deregulation and court appointments really worth all this? NYTIMES