When directors cite oversight, is that an acceptable defence?
THE Singapore Post issue has been well discussed and chronicled in the business media. At the core of the debate is whether fiduciary duties were properly observed and to what extent was it found wanting.
The Singapore Exchange is moving admirably towards a corporate sustainability regime and, to its credit, with flexibility. The Listing Manual and Corporate Disclosure policies are also under review, with the intent to tighten any possible loopholes as well to improve the compliance and disclosure infrastructure.
It is in light of this that we have to relook the fiduciary framework of directors of all listed entities. The Singapore Exchange, Singapore Institute of Directors, and Securities Investors Association (Singapore) would do well to study the issues and accord a compliance framework. I am sure there is already an existing construct that could be improved further.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access