You are here
UK rail industry is reaching key political junction
BRITAIN'S historic rail industry is destined for the biggest shakeup in decades that could end in renationalisation and significant investment to vastly improve services amid costly fares and delays. Full state-control of the industry is a distinct possibility should a looming general election triggered by Brexit turmoil result in victory for the main opposition Labour party.
At the same time, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson is awaiting the conclusions of a passenger-focused review of the UK's entire rail sector. "It isn't good enough that so many commuters spend their mornings staring at a delayed sign at their train platform," British finance minister Sajid Javid said last week. Delivering government spending plans for the next year, Mr Javid added that "better transport links across the country will be a crucial part" of rebalancing Britain's London-centric economy.
Mr Johnson has meanwhile ordered a separate review into the High Speed 2 (HS2) railway linking London with other major English cities, but which has been beset by soaring build costs and massive delays. Both reviews will deliver their findings by the end of the year, by which time Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn could be prime minister.
Full nationalisation of the rail industry that once helped to drive the Industrial Revolution "is undoubtedly a vote winner for Corbyn and Labour", said Gwilym David Blunt, lecturer in international politics at City, University of London. While Britain's rail tracks remain in state hands, the trains are run by mostly private companies enjoying large government subsidies.
"The railways were once a point of pride in this country and now they are absolutely dire compared to the rest of Europe," Mr Blunt told AFP. "UK trains are crowded, expensive, often delayed, and of extremely old stock. Voters are angry at receiving little value for money." Rail passenger journeys in Britain have hit a record annual high at almost 1.76 billion, fuelled by commuters who have no choice but to take the train to work.
The government's "root and branch" review of the rail sector, including improvements to freight travel, is chaired by Keith Williams, a former chief executive of British Airways. Presenting an interim update, Mr Williams noted that UK customer satisfaction with Britain's train services is at a decade-low.
Mr Williams' review "could be used to bolster the case for taking the railways back into public hands", said Mr Blunt. "However, if the review is pro-private ownership it won't necessarily stop renationalisation." He added that "the most plausible strategy" for Mr Corbyn would be to wait for the franchises running the train routes "to expire and take them back into public ownership".
Another headache lying ahead is HS2. The Department for Transport last week said that the cost of the project was set to soar by more than £20 billion (S$34 billion) to up to £88 billion owing to the complexity of building works. And rather than its first phase opening in 2026, trains now face not running until 2031.
The initial phase of HS2 - Britain's first new railway north of London in 150 years - plans to connect the capital in south-east England with the country's second biggest city Birmingham in the Midlands.
The second phase, which the government has said may now not open until 2040, is for trains to travel further north to Manchester and Leeds.
Another major new railway line - the Crossrail project offering an additional fast direct route between Heathrow airport and central London - has also been hit by significant delays and surging costs.
Due to have opened last December, Crossrail is now not expected to begin services until 2021, lifting construction costs by £3 billion to about £18 billion. To be known officially as the Elizabeth Line in honour of Britain's queen, Crossrail will serve also towns to the east and west of the capital. AFP