A different spirit of the law in OSIM takeover
YOU own some shares in a company. The founder wants to buy everybody out. You resist, claiming his price is too low.
But you cannot do much if the founder happens to also own such a big chunk of the company that he could - if he is able to quickly gather enough shareholders' acceptances - legally enforce compulsory acquisition at his bid price.
Is this unfair? The OSIM privatisation saga has dragged up a recurring issue in Singapore corporate law on how much power should be given to dissenting minority shareholders in a takeover.
Given the way the law is written now, minor…
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Companies & Markets
Tokyo's Nikkei drops more than 1,000 points, most in 3 years
Cordlife requests trading halt after dropping 15.2% to all-time low, pending announcement
Gazelle Ventures makes cash offer for No Signboard shares at S$0.0021 apiece
Inside TSMC chairman Mark Liu's short but impactful reign
CSE Global bags US$36.5 million data centre contract extension
Keppel DC Reit reports 13.7% lower Q1 DPU of S$0.02192 amid loss allowances