Quarterly reporting revisited
IS there a need to rethink the rules for quarterly reporting (QR)? The question is relevant following news this week that the Singapore Exchange (SGX) may relook the practice and may seek feedback from the public. The answer, however, depends on who you ask.
Proponents of transparency and better governance say it forces companies to communicate regularly with shareholders and is therefore indispensable.
Many corporate bosses and financial controllers of smaller companies, on the other hand, would argue that it places undue pressure on senior management to "manage'' their number, encourages short-termism, possibly increases share price volatility and, last but not least, costs too much because figures have to be collated and issued every 90 days.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Companies & Markets
DigitalBridge-backed Vantage said to weigh Hong Kong data centres sale
Vietnam delays launch of new stock trading system
Tesla’s plan for affordable cars takes page from Detroit rivals
Meituan to debut in Riyadh as expansion beyond China quickens
Mapletree Industrial Trust to distribute S$13 million of divestment gains over next 4 quarters
K-pop agency Hybe’s internal strife wipes out 1.2 trillion won