Quarterly reporting revisited
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
IS there a need to rethink the rules for quarterly reporting (QR)? The question is relevant following news this week that the Singapore Exchange (SGX) may relook the practice and may seek feedback from the public. The answer, however, depends on who you ask.
Proponents of transparency and better governance say it forces companies to communicate regularly with shareholders and is therefore indispensable.
Many corporate bosses and financial controllers of smaller companies, on the other hand, would argue that it places undue pressure on senior management to "manage'' their number, encourages short-termism, possibly increases share price volatility and, last but not least, costs too much because figures have to be collated and issued every 90 days.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Shelving S$5 billion office redevelopment plan proved ‘wise’ as geopolitical risks mount: OCBC chairman
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result
Beijing’s calculated silence on the Iran war
Middle East-linked energy supply shocks put Asean Power Grid back in focus