Should failing to act diligently be a crime?
The regulatory framework should be changed to ensure proper balance between compensation, deterrence and punishment for directors
MOST people think that so long as they do not cheat, steal or act dishonestly, they would have carried out their duties as directors under the law.
However, this is not the case in Singapore and it should be realised that the standard of governance for directors sets a much higher bar than that.
What's more, the penalties for failing to exercise proper due diligence can be very high. In fact, it can be criminal.
Criminal sanctions
The 2008 case of Chuan Soon Huat Industrial Group Limited is an important example. It is the first time that independent directors were convicted of a crime and punished for management's failure.
Chuan Soon Huat was a timber door maker, listed on the Singapore Exchange. The board of directors failed to disclose that the executive chairman was ill and no longer discharging his dut…
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Companies & Markets
TSMC estimates losses of US$92.4 million due to Taiwan earthquake
Singapore loses ‘world’s best airport’ crown to Qatar
Higher gross rental income, lower expenses boost CICT’s Q1 NPI by 6.3% to S$293.7 million
Stocks to watch: CICT, Seatrium, Keppel DC Reit, UOB
Keppel DC Reit reports 13.7% lower Q1 DPU of S$0.02192
Netflix handily beats subscriber targets, misses on revenue forecast