Receive $80 Grab vouchers valid for use on all Grab services except GrabHitch and GrabShuttle when you subscribe to BT All-Digital at only $0.99*/month.
Find out more at btsub.sg/promo
[NEW YORK] Sotheby's joined the long-running dispute over a Leonardo da Vinci painting that has pitted Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev against a Swiss businessman who operates the biggest art storage facilities around the world.
The auction house fired a preemptive shot with a request to a federal judge for an order clearing it of any wrongdoing in the private sale of "Christ as Salvator Mundi" to Yves Bouvier, president of Natural Le Coultre, that operates Geneva Freeport.
The painting was sold in 2013 to a company controlled by Mr Bouvier for US$80 million by a consortium of dealers that include Warren Adelson, president of Adelson Galleries, New York art dealers Alexander Parish and Robert Simon, Sotheby's said. Mr Bouvier flipped the painting to Mr Rybolovlev for US$127.5 million. The dealers' group is now threatening to sue Sotheby's for the difference, claiming they were shortchanged on the sale, the auction house said in a filing in Manhattan federal court Monday.
The international battle is being watched closely by the art market. The Russian fertiliser billionaire accused the freeport mogul of overcharging him by US$500 million to US$1 billion during the course of a decade for works by da Vinci, Mark Rothko and Pablo Picasso. Mr Rybolovlev sued Mr Bouvier in Monaco and Singapore, claiming he was the victim of fraud.
Mr Rybolovlev declined to comment on the Sotheby's filing. Mr Simon also declined to comment on behalf of the consortium.
Sotheby's had nothing to do with the private deal Mr Bouvier struck with Mr Rybolovlev and it didn't make any money on the sale, the auction house said in the court filing.
Mr Parish had apparently bought the painting for less than US$10,000 at an estate sale in Louisiana in the early 2000s, Sotheby's said in the filing. It was long believed the work was a copy of a da Vinci, but Sotheby's said in the filing it later helped in the authentication of the painting as having been done by the master around 1500.
The group that sold the painting may be "experiencing seller's remorse," Sotheby's said in its complaint. "The defendants no doubt wish they had made even more money."
Sotheby's asked for an order declaring that it's not liable to the selling group for any losses they claim to have suffered from the sale.
The case is Sotheby's Inc v RW Chandler LLC, 16-cv-09043, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).