Re-imagining the Code for an ESG world
Singapore should consider more fully embedding “environmental” and “social” issues into the corporate governance principles, provisions and guidance.
ONE of the key decisions the Corporate Governance Committee which developed the first Code of Corporate Governance in Singapore had to make was whether to base it on the shareholder or stakeholder model. It opted for the shareholder model, although it recognised that enhancing long-term shareholder value requires the interests of other stakeholders to be taken into account. The first paragraph of its report defined corporate governance as follows:
“Corporate governance refers to the processes and structure by which the business and affairs of the company are directed and managed, in order to enhance long term shareholder value through enhancing corporate performance and accountability, whilst taking into account the interests of other stakeholders. Good corporate governance embodies both enterprise (performance) and accountability (conformance).”
I believe it was the right decision to adopt the shareholder model at that time, to provide a clear focus for companies and boards.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
In Jamie Dimon’s America, the stock market has already voted
Musk has made Tesla a meme stock
The dog ate Japan’s plan to phase out coal power
Beyond US aid, Ukraine needs European allies to step up
Singapore offices await a new wave of tenants
Climate philanthropy key to South-east Asia’s green transition