Britain will need a new vote on the European Union
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
Singapore
WHEN 50.3 per cent of Danish voters on June 2, 1992 voted No to the Maastricht treaty on economic and monetary union, I was state secretary in the Danish Foreign Affairs Ministry. My task was to advise the government which course to set as a result of the vote, and an agreement with the Europeans was negotiated over five months. Four Danish exemptions were approved at the European Council meeting in December 1992 - under the British European Union (EU) presidency. In a referendum in May 1993, 55.4 per cent voted Yes to the new terms.
The lessons learned during these 12 months could prove useful to the UK, where calls to hold a second referendum on EU membership persist despite the British Parliament's dismissal on Sept 5 of a petition to hold a new poll. It would be hasty to call for a new referendum soon after the June 23 vote, when my fears of a No vote were borne out. But it would be equally hasty to rule it out. In two or three years, circumstances may be so messy that a referendum could be the most democratic response to a number of unpalatable scenarios.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Air India asks Tata, Singapore Airlines for funds after US$2.4 billion loss
‘Boring’ is the new black: The stars are aligning for a Singapore stock market revival
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
South-east Asian markets account for 8.8% of global capital inflows from 2021 to 2024: report