Hand-picked Noble committee not independent
THE recent announcement by the Noble Group that it has established an independent committee to review its accounting practises warrants a response.
This is a small step in the wrong direction. My problem with this supposedly independent committee is its extremely narrow and limited scope of only looking at mark-to-market (MTM) valuations and that only a Noble vetted summary will be released by the board committee. This hand-picked, insider board committee should not in anyway be considered "independent".
Noble is engaging in a PR exercise in which I, for one, have no confidence. As long as Richard Elman, the 75-year-old founder and executive chairman of Noble 20 per cent shareholder and member of the audit, nominating and compensation committees, has a formal role in Noble, there can be no possibility of a truly independent assessment of Noble's accounting.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access