Independent or irrelevant directors?
Independence of these three Swiber directors is debatable.
SWIBER'S tardy disclosures, sudden announcement of a winding-up application, mass resignations of executive directors, reversal of its winding-up application and retraction of a resignation announcement have befuddled and angered investors. Singapore Exchange's chief regulatory officer has - quite rightly - said that there will be investigations and regulatory actions may be taken.
When Swiber won in the small-cap category of the Singapore Corporate Governance Award in 2012, its group chief executive Francis Wong had this to say: "... We also continue to review our processes to improve each aspect of corporate governance to be in line with best practices. Swiber's board is mindful of the interests of its stakeholders ... Swiber will continue to be a steward of excellent corporate governance practices across its operations."
Swiber's approach to corporate governance disclosures and practices has not changed much over the years, and, given the recent events, those words ring hollow now.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access