Overcoming synergy odds in an M&A deal
A key reason for disappointing deal outcomes is overestimation, which is caused by a lack of clear understanding of the level of synergies merging companies can expect through increased scale.
THE open secret about mergers and acquisitions (M&As) is that most deals fail to generate the synergies companies expect when they announce a merger. In a Bain & Company survey of 352 global executives, overestimating synergies was the second most common reason for disappointing deal outcomes.
One of the causes of this overestimation is well known: Companies set aggressive targets to justify a deal price to financiers. But Bain analysis comparing deal announcements with the performance of more than 22,000 companies has unveiled another, even more fundamental contributor to the rampant overestimation. Most merging companies entering a deal don't have a clear understanding of the level of synergies they can expect through increased scale.
Instead, they typically make broad estimates based on prior deal announcements, without considering whether the cost structure of the combined entity is realistic based on benchmarks of like-sized companies.
TRENDING NOW
DBS completes US$1 billion significant risk transfer deal, in first for Singapore bank
Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan’s sell-downs point to pruning rather than an exit plan
Singapore private housing is ‘decoupling’ from HDB market as buyer pools diverge: NUS survey
Not in education, employment or training: Why more Hong Kong youths are opting out of work