Poorly performing family firms more likely to improve governance
Singapore
IT IS common for people to associate family firms with poor governance, with many believing that controlling families like to have maximum discretion and minimum transparency. Yet, we also know that family owners care deeply about their reputation and would avoid anything that harms it, including bad governance practices. This debate on whether family firms are heroes or villains of corporate governance has been a long-running one.
But the time has come to look at things from a different perspective. There is considerable variety among family firms - some have very good governance practices, while others lag behind. We should not discredit or praise all family firms as if they were a single entity, but instead find out what types of family firms have better governance, and why.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access