Preventing the next financial system panic
Washington
THE hostility towards Wall Street remains so great that both major US political parties say, in their platforms, that they'd like to break up America's biggest banks. But before engaging in this drastic economic surgery, it's worth examining whether Dodd-Frank is working. Recall that the law - named after its congressional sponsors, former senator Christopher Dodd and former representative Barney Frank - overhauled the financial system to make it more panic-proof. Is it? The answer may surprise.
The Obama administration's position is clear: "We can say without question that Wall Street reform has made our financial system safer and sounder," Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew recently said on the sixth anniversary of the law's signing. Up to a point, this is true. Banks are required to have more capital than before the 2008-09 financial crisis, and this creates a larger buffer against losses.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access