US must rely on multilateral trade diplomacy, not bilateral threats
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
ON Monday, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order authorising US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer to determine whether there should be an investigation of China's practices in the area of intellectual property protection.
After much heated rhetoric criticising China's trade policies, which goes back to last year's US presidential election campaign (and indeed, even earlier), this is the first concrete step taken by the Trump administration that could lead to punitive policies towards China on trade issues. If Mr Lighthizer's investigation concludes that China has indeed breached rules on intellectual property protection, this would open the way for unilateral protectionist measures under the draconian Section 301 of the US Trade Act of 1974. That would, if it happens, be a retrograde step.
What is also a retrograde step is the linking of US trade policy towards China with China's actions (or lack thereof) to rein in North Korea's missile and nuclear programmes. Although some US officials have denied such a link, Mr Trump's statements clearly suggest that it exists. "... if China helps us (on North Korea), I feel a lot differently toward trade," he said a few days ago.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Mustafa Centre begins fit-out at JB’s Capital City Mall after 2-year delay
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result
‘Boring’ is the new black: The stars are aligning for a Singapore stock market revival
South-east Asian markets account for 8.8% of global capital inflows from 2021 to 2024: report