CIO CORNER
·
SUBSCRIBERS

‘Fingers of instability’ and the possible impact on global markets

Markets can run smoothly until a seemingly insignificant piece of news has an outsized impact on markets

    • The reduced willingness of shipping companies to sail through the Red Sea and the Suez Canal raises the risk that the regional conflict would have global consequences.
    • The reduced willingness of shipping companies to sail through the Red Sea and the Suez Canal raises the risk that the regional conflict would have global consequences. PHOTO: REUTERS
    Published Tue, Mar 12, 2024 · 05:00 PM

    WHEN the Middle East conflict began in October last year, the conventional wisdom was that nobody had an incentive to allow this conflict to spread to the rest of the region.

    Since then, we have had a series of minor escalations. In isolation, none of them seem that significant. But collectively they add up to a significant broadening of the conflict. Does this mean something will happen that will lead to a sudden re-evaluation of the outlook for growth or inflation?

    I am reminded of the concept of “fingers of instability”. This describes a situation where if you add a grain of sand to a sandpile, it is unlikely to lead to a significant change in the structure of the sandpile. However, if you do it long enough, then it will create fingers of instability in the sandpile such that, eventually, just one additional grain of sand causes an avalanche.

    Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

    Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services