Conglomerates are not built equally
They offer diversified earnings streams, but can be complex and prone to value destruction
Add BT as a preferred sourceDeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
WHEN Singapore's Keppel Corporation made a bid of as much as S$3.2 billion in January to buy the shares of subsidiary Keppel Land (KepLand) that it did not own, Keppel Corp CEO Loh Chin Hua expressed an ambition for his company to be like the world's top 20 conglomerates, which trade at a sizeable premium to their net asset values.
In making that remark, Mr Loh was perhaps aiming, like what every good CEO should, to create shareholder value. That is, if Keppel Corp - then trading at nine to 11 times forward earnings and 1.4 times book value - could rearrange the bits and pieces of its diverse businesses in a better way, then the stock market would decide the company is worth more.
The KepLand privatisation was interesting as it came after a series of corporate actions by Singapore conglomerates that aimed to sell off assets instead of acquiring them.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Japan stocks look set for new highs in 2025 on earnings, reform
Beijing’s calculated silence on the Iran war
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant
