Revisiting board risk governance structures
A strong BRC provides invaluable support to the board and the audit committee by optimising decision-making around risks.
COMPANIES today face increasingly complex risks, especially in relation to the gradual loss of market share to competitors and the impact of new technology. The board is ultimately responsible for assessing and managing these and other risks; but how it structures itself to discharge this responsibility varies.
The most common approach is to allocate risk governance to the audit committee, often renamed the audit and risk committee. In 2016, KPMG studied the disclosures of 100 listed companies in Singapore and found that 75 per cent had taken this course.
However, almost without exception, the audit committee's agenda is already crowded. Besides the heavy duty of reviewing the financial statements, it provides oversight on internal controls, fraud, whistle-blowing and other aspects of financial risks. A separate KPMG study found that 50 per cent of the members of audit committees of Singapore-based companies find it increasingly difficult to properly oversee the major risks of their companies.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Companies & Markets
Coffee variety is priciest since 1970s in blow to instant brews
South Korea’s probe alleges 211.2 billion won of illegal short trades
RBNZ has limited scope to cut cash rate this year: OECD
Crypto.com wants to sponsor more sports after Formula One Miami
Philippine central bank tightens dirty money risk reporting rule
It is time to put idle cash back into the market