Asia Square didn't fit with strategy or meet required returns, CapitaLand implies
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
CAPITALAND on Wednesday implied that it had earlier bowed out of negotiations to buy Asia Square Tower 1 office building because the property did not fit with its group strategy, and its yields did not meet requirements.
At its results briefing, CapitaLand Singapore CEO Wen Khai Meng said: "Whether it's Asia Square or any (other) opportunities, when we look at them, we judge them according to two criteria: whether it fits in with our strategy, and whether the return profile of the project meets our requirements.
"For Asia Square, that's how we evaluated it like any other project. As to why the negotiation didn't proceed further, I think we are bound by confidentiality agreements."
Group chief financial officer Arthur Lang added that these two criteria are important, so much so that if the seller cannot meet them, the group will "walk".
"When we come to all these opportunities, we have to stay fairly disciplined," he said.
Last November, CapitaLand said it had ceased negotiations with the seller, BlackRock.
Navigate Asia in
a new global order
Get the insights delivered to your inbox.
The office building houses tenants Citigroup and Swiss private bank Julius Baer and, according to Bloomberg, could be valued at more than S$3.5 billion - making it possibly Singapore's largest office transaction ever, if it happens, it said.
Talks with other potential buyers are said to still be in progress.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Vietnam formalises new state leadership, redefining ‘four pillars’ power balance
‘Largest Singapore commercial S-Reit proxy’: analysts say buy CICT shares after Paragon acquisition
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Why where you park your joint venture matters: Lessons from a US$689 million shareholder dispute