New banking regulations won't prevent bailouts
Sydney
SINCE the 2008 financial crisis, policy makers around the world have put new rules in place to make banks less risky and more transparent. They're confident that these changes have made the financial system safer and eliminated the need for taxpayer bailouts. But as Julius Caesar said: "Men willingly believe what they wish to be true."
Start with new rules on capital. Prodded by regulators, banks have been increasing their buffers against losses with higher levels of shareholder capital and total loss-absorbing capital, or TLAC. But more capital won't reduce the incidence of losses: In any future crisis, the problem will simply be transferred to shareholders and holders of TLAC securities, such as private investors, pension funds and insurance companies. Given the systemic and political importance of those investors, a government bailout is still the likely result.
TRENDING NOW
Once staunchly pro-China, Malaysian Chinese businesses are now distancing themselves from Beijing
Stocks to watch: HPL, Aims Apac Reit, Zico, Advanced Systems Automation, ComfortDelGro
‘How many will survive?’: Bubble fears arise as China’s humanoid robotics face reality check
Smaller board lots can’t fix a market run by three banks