Abbott to pay US$385 million in US settlement over contaminated infant formula allegations
Unsanitary conditions at firm’s Michigan plant include roof leaks and inadequate cleaning procedures
ABBOTT Laboratories, the maker of the popular infant formula Similac, will pay nearly US$385 million to settle claims that it knowingly sold formula manufactured in facilities that did not meet safety requirements.
The settlement, announced on Monday (Sep 14) by the US Justice Department, follows years of scrutiny of a plant Abbott managed in Sturgis, Michigan, that produced a sizable share of the US’ formula supply. In 2022, Abbott initiated a recall of powdered formulas manufactured at the plant, after federal health officials linked the products to four infants who were hospitalised with rare bacterial infections, two of whom died.
Production at the facility was halted, contributing to a nationwide formula shortage that lasted for months.
In a statement provided to The New York Times on Monday, the company, which did not admit liability or fault in the settlement, noted that “no unopened, distributed Abbott infant formulas have ever tested positive” for the bacteria that sickened the babies, including containers from the homes of the infants.
“We make infant formula with the same care we would for our own families and are deeply committed to earning and maintaining caregivers’ trust,” the company said.
The federal government’s complaint detailed unsanitary conditions at the Michigan plant, including roof leaks, deteriorating equipment and inadequate cleaning procedures.
Instead of fixing the roof leaks, the department said, Abbott installed umbrellas, which diverted water from production areas but created a wet environment ripe for bacterial growth. The company’s spray dryers, which were used to turn liquid formula into powder, had cracks and pits, which increased the risk of contamination, the complaint said, and Abbott ran more batches of formula through the dryers between cleaning cycles than was safe.
The Justice Department also claimed that Abbott purposefully chose not to test for bacterial contamination and that, when the company did perform tests, it did not share positive results with the US Food and Drug Administration.
In a 2022 consent decree reached with the Justice Department, Abbott agreed to replace the plant’s roof, address sanitation protocols and take other corrective steps, though it did not admit liability. In a hearing before a House panel that year, an Abbott representative said it prioritised “safety and compliance in our plants.”
The Abbott recall underscored broader concerns about the safety and oversight of the US infant formula supply. In 2025, the formula company ByHeart, whose products were linked to an infant botulism outbreak, shut down its Pennsylvania plant after inspectors found safety violations, including mould in a clean-water tank and dead insects in a production area. The company recalled all lots of its formula.
Nearly US$349 million of the Abbott settlement funds will go to the federal government and just over US$36 million will go to state Medicaid and the federal supplemental nutrition programme for women, infants and children, known as WIC, that purchased Abbott’s formula. Three whistleblowers who first filed complaints about the plant will receive US$69 million. NYTIMES
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
PSD reviewing paper that alleges civil servants disproportionately bought homes near unannounced MRT stations
CapitaLand Investment’s retrenchments: Mind the downsides of a profitable business laying off staff
Stocks to watch: Sats, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, SBS Transit, GuocoLand
US 10-year Treasury yield tops 5% for first time since 2023 as inflation fears mount
