Amex 'anti-competitive' but ruling may not help consumers
US federal judge's ruling may bring lower card company fees for retailers, but not necessarily gains for consumers
New York
LAST week, a federal judge handed down a major ruling against American Express, deciding that the brand-name card issuer had engaged in anti-competitive practices for more than a decade.
The court ruled that a part of American Express' contract with merchants known as a "non-discrimination provision" had led to less competition, not more, and pushed consumer prices higher. That clause was intended to make merchants treat all credit card holders similarly without favouring one card company over another.
TRENDING NOW
Simba admits exceeding spectrum limits amid failed M1 deal; parent company Tuas’ full-year profit surges 277%
He built the Vingroup empire. Now South-east Asia’s richest man is handing some key roles to his sons
What’s on the agenda when Xi and Trump meet in Washington
Ex-execs of CW Group, Allied Tech charged with offences linked to lawyer’s S$76 million misappropriation