Japanese professor 'made students produce Ecstasy'
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
Tokyo
A JAPANESE university professor could face up to 10 years in jail after allegedly getting his students to produce ecstasy, officials said on Wednesday, in an echo of TV hit series Breaking Bad.
Authorities suspect the 61-year-old pharmacology professor from Matsuyama University in western Japan got his pupils to make MDMA - commonly known as ecstasy - in 2013 and another so-called "designer drug" 5F-QUPIC last year.
The professor told investigators he was aiming to further the "education" of his pharmaceutical sciences students, an official from the local health ministry told AFP.
The ecstasy allegedly produced has not been found and has "probably been discarded", added this official, who asked to remain anonymous.
If charged and convicted, he could face 10 years behind bars.
Navigate Asia in
a new global order
Get the insights delivered to your inbox.
Japanese law states that a researcher needs a licence issued by regional authorities to manufacture narcotics for academic purposes.
The synthetic drug MDMA acts as a stimulant and hallucinogen and is the main ingredient in party drug ecstasy, giving users a heightened sense of energy, empathy and pleasure. It has recently been used in research trials exploring its effectiveness in treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
5F-QUPIC, also known as 5F-PB-22, is a cannabis-like drug banned in Japan in 2014 after it was suspected of causing traffic accidents.
It is unclear if there were any other similarities between the case of the Matsuyama University professor and that of Walter White, the fictitious hero of Breaking Bad. AFP
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Autobahn Rent A Car directors declared bankrupt over S$50 million each owed to DBS
Amazon’s MGM Studios gains creative control over ‘James Bond’ franchise
UOB’s Wee Ee Cheong says S$4.9 billion Citi deal ‘paying off’ as Asean push accelerates
In taxing wealth, how far can Singapore push property owners?