Deadlocks: Should directors boycott meetings?
It may be seen as dereliction of a director's fiduciary duty if he does not participate and influence the outcomes of a meeting, or at least to record his position.
THERE can be problematic situations, such as in a shareholders' deadlock, when directors may feel that their best option is to purposely not attend a meeting. This, in effect, means choosing to boycott a meeting.
A common reason for a director to opt not to attend a meeting could be to avoid the unpleasantness of being caught in a heated crossfire.
From a tactical standpoint, directors may collectively decide to be absent so that the mandatory quorum requirements are not met, thus invalidating the meeting proper and preventing a quarrelsome decision from being passed. This …
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Companies & Markets
Gazelle Ventures makes cash offer for No Signboard shares at S$0.0021 apiece
Singapore shares open higher on Friday; STI up 0.2%
TSMC estimates losses of US$92.4 million due to Taiwan earthquake
Singapore loses ‘world’s best airport’ crown to Qatar
Higher gross rental income, lower expenses boost CICT’s Q1 NPI by 6.3% to S$293.7 million
Stocks to watch: CICT, Seatrium, Keppel DC Reit, UOB