Disgruntled ARA Logos unitholders should vote
Reit mergers are driven by property market dynamics and shifting priorites of real estate groups rather than the pursuit of size
SOME readers of The Business Times took umbrage at this column's suggestion a fortnight ago that minority unitholders of ARA Logos Logistics Trust might choose to support its proposed merger with ESR-Reit.
The point I was making was that once ESR Cayman acquires ARA Asset Management, there is likely to be uncertainty as to which of the two real estate investment trusts (Reits) will benefit from the asset pipeline of their combined parent group. A merger of ARA Logos and ESR-Reit would negate this issue of their overlapping mandates.
The problem is that the terms of the proposed merger obviously favour unitholders of ESR-Reit over unitholders of ARA Logos. Indeed, the merger announcement on Oct 15 immediately triggered a sell-off in ARA Logos versus ESR-Reit.
TRENDING NOW
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
Thai and Vietnamese farmers may stop planting rice because of the Iran war. Here’s why
MAS convenes bank CEOs over AI cyberthreats; boards told to own risks, not leave to IT teams
Is it time to scrap COE categories for cars?