Carbon tax best way to cut greenhouse gas emissions: IMF
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
Washington
AT US$70 per tonne of carbon dioxide, a carbon tax would be the most efficient means of cutting greenhouse gas emissions, according to an International Monetary Fund (IMF) report published Friday.
But for the moment, carbon taxes remain unpopular, particularly in France, where plans to increase them to 55 euros (S$84) from 44.60 euros recently ignited the Yellow Vest protest movement. The French government was forced to suspend the plan in the face of popular revolt.
The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015 by more than 200 countries, aims to cap overall increases in global temperatures at two degrees centigrade above the pre-industrial era.
"The 2C target would require cutting emissions by roughly a third by 2030 and a global carbon price of around US$70 per tonne," IMF managing director Christine Lagarde and Vitor Gaspar, the fund's head of fiscal affairs, said in a joint blog post.
"There is a growing consensus that carbon pricing... is the single most effective mitigation instrument," they said. It allows for a reduction in energy consumption, favours cleaner energies and mobilises private financing, according to the IMF.
Navigate Asia in
a new global order
Get the insights delivered to your inbox.
"It also provides much needed revenues," they said, adding that countries could use that income to finance sustainable and more inclusive growth. In the report, the IMF said that in China, the world's largest emitter, and in India or South Africa, countries which rely heavily on coal, a carbon tax of just US$35 per tonne would cut emissions by 30 per cent. AFP
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Ministry of Home Affairs Permanent Secretary Pang Kin Keong to retire
Shelving S$5 billion office redevelopment plan proved ‘wise’ as geopolitical risks mount: OCBC chairman
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result