Insurers' par fund management - case for more clarity and certainty
THE case for more clarity and certainty in how life insurers in Singapore manage their participating (par) funds is straightforward, particularly as local regulator Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has for a while now been exploring ways to narrow the knowledge gap between life insurance players and consumers.
Better management and greater disclosures provide more transparency in an opaque sector, which in turn better manage policyholders' expectations and, more importantly, safeguard consumers' interests - something MAS has often highlighted, most recently at the annual Life Insurance Association luncheon in early March.
The problem is that full disclosure will not sit well with profit-conscious insurers who may find it in their interests to be somewhat less forthcoming with all details, particularly when some are commercially sensitive. It is therefore incumbent on the regulator to balance the two possibly conflicting positions when formulating disclosure policy. When deciding which way to lean, it will be worthwhile studying the example of Malaysia, where the Malaysian central bank, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), has recently set in motion the path to greater transparency with new requirements in managing par funds to kick in from July.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Companies & Markets
Gold prices set for weekly decline ahead of US inflation data
Huawei’s new phone sports latest version of made-in-China chip
Meta’s earnings flop sparks US$400 billion sell-off in tech stocks
Singapore shares open lower on Friday; STI down 0.1%
OUE wins tender to lease, develop new ‘zero-energy’ hotel at Changi Airport’s T2
Roku’s warning on ad-supported streaming competition clouds upbeat earnings