You are here
More SGX-listed firms communicating sustainability information, but disclosure on board’s efforts is limited: study
MORE Singapore Exchange-listed (SGX-listed) companies have embarked on sustainability reporting, but board commitment is questionable, a report showed.
The latest Sustainability Reporting in Singapore study by National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School’s Centre for Governance, Institutions and Organisations (CGIO) and Asean CSR Network (ACN) showed that 327 out of a total of 678 - or 48.3 per cent - of SGX mainboard and Catalist-listed companies, communicated their sustainability practices. This translates to an average level of disclosure of 55.3 percentage points as at May 31, 2018.
The study examined information disclosed by SGX-listed companies between Jan 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018 and compared the data against the biennial studies conducted in 2016 and 2014. In 2016, the SGX introduced sustainability reporting for all publicly listed companies on a “comply or explain” basis.
While the percentage of reporting companies has increased from 37.1 per cent in 2016 and 31.3 per cent in 2014, the average level of sustainability disclosures increased by just three percentage points since 2016 from 52.1 per cent to 55.3 per cent.
In Singapore, City Developments, CapitaLand, Singapore Telecommunications, Olam International and DBS Group Holdings came out tops for best practices in sustainability communication.
Some 186 out of the 327 companies demonstrated board level involvement in identifying and managing economic, environmental, and social (EES) impacts, but only 31 companies had linked EES topics performance with the remuneration of board and senior executives, the report showed. Meanwhile, 96 companies disclosed training policy on EES topics for board of directors, but disclosure on the board's involvement in driving sustainability is seen as limited.
“Driven by the new requirement, the state of sustainability reporting has witnessed major advancements in the past two years. However, board leadership and commitment have to be elevated for this reporting to keep the momentum. These will be the most critical incentives for sustainability to be robustly embedded across the entire company,” said Lawrence Loh, director of CGIO at NUS Business School.
The Singapore Exchange Sustainability Reporting Guide looks at five components, namely: material economic, social and governance (ESG) factors; policies practices and performance; targets; sustainability reporting framework and board statement.
Policies, practices and performance was best disclosed, with 308 companies - up from 137 companies in 2016 - following through in this respect, the report highlighted. Meanwhile, sustainability reporting framework was the least adhered component with 201 companies reporting the primary components, although this was up by 167 companies compared to 2016.
However, gaps still exist between the material issues reported and stakeholders’ expectations, particularly, disclosures pertaining to emissions, biodiversity, product and services stewardship. The evident gap could be due to the large number of first time reports, or ineffective stakeholder engagement, the report highlighted.
The study also looked at sustainability reporting practices of the largest companies by market capitalisation listed on the major bourses of Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand.
In the region, Malaysia had the highest score of 64.5 percentage points in overall sustainability disclosure level, followed by Singapore, Thailand, the Philippines and Indonesia. Overall, Asean countries had made progress as compared to 2016.