Nio closes 2.7% higher after rebounding from plunge following GIC lawsuit
Morningstar says the lawsuit’s allegations are not expected to have material impact on the company’s operations
[SINGAPORE] Shares of Nio recovered on Friday (Oct 17) after having dived to a one-month low the day before, when a lawsuit filed by GIC against the China electric vehicle (EV) maker wiped billions off the group’s market value.
The counter pared down its losses on Friday morning, after closing on Thursday 9.5 per cent or US$0.66 lower at US$6.30 on the Singapore Exchange – its secondary listing. Its primary listing is on the New York Stock Exchange.
Shortly after the market opened on Friday, it rose as much as US$0.45 or 7.1 per cent above Thursday’s closing price to US$6.75 as at 9.10 am. It later pared some gains to end at US$6.47, up 2.7 per cent or S$0.17, with 456,120 shares traded.
Nio’s shares fell as much as 13.8 per cent or US$0.96 to a one-month low of US$6 on Thursday, after news broke that Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC had lodged a lawsuit against it.
GIC is suing top executives of Nio – including its current chairman and chief executive Li Bin (also known as William Li) and its former chief financial officer Feng Wei – for allegedly inflating revenues of at least US$600 million.
The sovereign fund is seeking damages incurred from its purchase of some 54.5 million Nio American depository shares (ADS) between August 2020 and July 2022, at prices that it alleges to be “inflated artificially”.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Nio is accused of having pulled forward over US$600 million in revenue from a battery asset and leasing joint venture (JV) – Weineng Battery Asset (Weineng) – and of unlawfully recognising it as immediate revenue. The lawsuit also alleges that Nio did not disclose that it controlled Weineng.
The lawsuit stated that Weineng was owned by Nio and “several of its cronies” and designed to advance the company’s interests by taking over the carmaker’s battery subscription business to “allow Nio to unlawfully pull forward the revenue from the leased batteries immediately”.
Nio formed Weineng in 2020 as an ostensibly independent JV with three other entities. The JV bought over Nio’s batteries and its battery leasing services, which led to a dramatic improvement for the EV maker’s financials, with its revenue more than doubling to 6.6 billion yuan (S$1.2 billion) in Q4 of 2020.
Nio’s revenue rose from 16.3 billion yuan in FY2020 to 26.1 billion yuan for FY2021, with 4.1 billion yuan or around US$600 million of the FY2021 revenue coming from Weineng alone, GIC said.
On the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, Nio’s other secondary listing venue, the counter similarly closed Thursday lower by 9 per cent or HK$4.87, at HK$49.28, but had rebounded on Friday. It traded as high as HK$52.30 on Friday morning, up 6.1 per cent or HK$3.02.
Notwithstanding Nio’s share price retreat in Hong Kong on Thursday, Morningstar senior equity analyst Vincent Sun said that the group’s vehicle sales and an improvement in profitability “would likely support near-term share prices”.
Sun said that the group could suffer reputational damage from the lawsuit, but maintained his fair value estimate for the company at US$5.30 per ADS or HK$41.60 per share.
Pointing to the ADS price having climbed up more than 50 per cent year to date, Sun noted that Nio shares are “fairly valued in the three-star territory”.
“While the allegation makes a dent in Nio’s corporate governance, we do not expect it to have a material impact on its (operations) with the ramp-up of new ES8 and Onvo L90 car production,” Sun said.
He remains “conservative” on Nio for now, citing uncertainty about the group’s ability to grow its sales and narrow losses.
Morningstar’s base case scenario forecasts Nio posting a loss of 7.7 billion yuan in 2026 and turning profitable in 2027, which is later than management’s guidance, Sun said.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
