Quarz's campaign may help rather than hinder the proposed merger of MCT and MNACT
Its insistence that MNACT is being undervalued might - perversely - mollify disgruntled MCT unitholders inclined to vote against the merger
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
THE proposed merger of Mapletree Commercial Trust (MCT) and Mapletree North Asia Commercial Trust (MNACT) made headlines again this past week as Quarz Capital Management urged unitholders of MNACT to demand better terms or vote against the deal.
Quarz grumbled in a letter to MNACT's manager dated Feb 9 that the merger values MNACT at discount to its net asset value (NAV), and that the transaction will destroy value for unitholders.
This is an interesting twist. When the proposed merger of the two Mapletree real estate investment trusts (Reits) was announced on Dec 31, the consensus in the market seemed to be that the terms of the deal favoured unitholders of MNACT over those of MCT.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Shelving S$5 billion office redevelopment plan proved ‘wise’ as geopolitical risks mount: OCBC chairman
OCBC is said to emerge as lead bidder for HSBC Indonesia assets
Middle East-linked energy supply shocks put Asean Power Grid back in focus
Eurokars Group introduces rental car franchises Enterprise Rent-A-Car, National Car Rental, and Alamo to Singapore