City Law denies having advised claimant in ‘99-to-1’ lawsuit
The firm says it only assisted in the conveyancing of Melvin Li’s property transactions
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
THE law firm that is being sued over two “99-to-1” property deals – alongside mainboard-listed PropNex ’s subsidiary and its agent – disputed having advised the claimant that these transactions were legal and valid.
City Law is contesting all the allegations, including of being negligent and breaching its duty of care to the claimant Melvin Li in his purchases of a 1 per cent interest in his parents’ newly bought properties that the firm handled.
In its defence filed on Friday (Mar 7), City Law claimed that it only assisted in the conveyancing of the property transactions. The scope of its work did not include advising on the legality or potential implications of the “99-to-1” arrangement.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Air India asks Tata, Singapore Airlines for funds after US$2.4 billion loss
‘Boring’ is the new black: The stars are aligning for a Singapore stock market revival
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
South-east Asian markets account for 8.8% of global capital inflows from 2021 to 2024: report