Disgruntled ARA Logos unitholders should vote
Reit mergers are driven by property market dynamics and shifting priorites of real estate groups rather than the pursuit of size
SOME readers of The Business Times took umbrage at this column's suggestion a fortnight ago that minority unitholders of ARA Logos Logistics Trust might choose to support its proposed merger with ESR-Reit.
The point I was making was that once ESR Cayman acquires ARA Asset Management, there is likely to be uncertainty as to which of the two real estate investment trusts (Reits) will benefit from the asset pipeline of their combined parent group. A merger of ARA Logos and ESR-Reit would negate this issue of their overlapping mandates.
The problem is that the terms of the proposed merger obviously favour unitholders of ESR-Reit over unitholders of ARA Logos. Indeed, the merger announcement on Oct 15 immediately triggered a sell-off in ARA Logos versus ESR-Reit.
TRENDING NOW
Soon Su Lin to step down as Frasers Property Singapore CEO; Tan Wee Hsien named successor
Interest in SGX-listed small and mid-cap stocks returning, but analysts flag overvalued tech stocks
Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan’s sell-downs point to pruning rather than an exit plan
Taiwan’s wealthy seeks diversification to Singapore, sparking private banking race: Bloomberg