Sakae case: Who's blowing the whistle on corporate Singapore?
Michelle Quah
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
FOOD chain Sakae Sushi may be viewed as having scored a recent victory in its long-running legal battle with a former director, but we shouldn't be so quick as to blow the full-time whistle just yet.
While Singapore's apex court did last week rule in Sakae's favour in its claims against former director Andy Ong, the court's findings of "systemic abuse" and "misappropriation of funds (and) assets" by Mr Ong may also have put the entire matter well into extra time, by begging another question: where have Singapore's corporate and market regulators been on this issue?
First, a necessary recap of this long-running case. Mainboard-listed Sakae Holdings (Sakae), which runs the Sakae Sushi chain, had in September 2010 invested in a 24.69 per cent stake in a joint venture company, Griffin Real Estate Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (GREIH).
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Higher costs, lower returns: Why are Singaporeans still betting on real estate?
South-east Asian markets account for 8.8% of global capital inflows from 2021 to 2024: report
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant