COMMENTARY

‘So little’?: Why critics of Temasek’s 10.5% returns in a bull run are getting it wrong

To pan its returns is to miss the basic point of sovereign wealth, which is to aim to survive market winters

Jude Chan
Published Fri, Jul 10, 2026 · 07:00 AM
    • Temasek’s one-year total shareholder return of 10.5% should not be judged against the 29.2% total return of the Straits Times Index over the same period, the writer argues.
    • Temasek’s one-year total shareholder return of 10.5% should not be judged against the 29.2% total return of the Straits Times Index over the same period, the writer argues. PHOTO: BT FILE

    ​WHEN state-owned investment company Temasek on Wednesday (Jul 8) unveiled its FY2026 review, the headline figures were undeniably strong: a net portfolio value surging to a record S$518 billion, bolstered by a net investment gain of S$20 billion and a one-year Total Shareholder Return (TSR) of 10.5 per cent.

    But there was a fair bit of criticism. “A low-cost S&P 500 index fund would have given a better return,” one Facebook user commented.

    Another pointed to Temasek’s 20-year TSR of “only” 6.8 per cent. “So little,” the user said, claiming that he generated similar returns on his own portfolio over the same period. “But I didn’t pay millions to do it.”