India defends antitrust penalty law in Apple fight
The watchdog says it could compute penalties from global turnover, but only sought “India-specific financial details”
[NEW DELHI] A law used to calculate fines on the basis of a company’s global turnover will discourage breaches by multinationals, India’s antitrust watchdog told a court in opposing Apple’s high-profile challenge to the measure.
In November, Apple asked New Delhi judges to strike down the 2024 law, which could also have implications for global giants such as Pernod Ricard, Publicis, Amazon and other foreign companies facing antitrust scrutiny.
The law “aligns Indian competition law enforcement with established international practice”, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) said in a Dec 15 court filing, which is not public. It was the first time the rationale was laid out in detail.
Weighing only India-specific turnover as the basis for the calculation of penalties, especially in the case of global digital firms, fails to deter the impugned behaviour, the regulator added.
“This approach ensures that penalties retain real deterrent value in complex, digital and cross-border markets, rather than becoming nominal or easily absorbable for large multinational players,” the CCI said in the filing.
Apple and the CCI did not respond to requests for comments on the filing.
Navigate Asia in
a new global order
Get the insights delivered to your inbox.
In its lawsuit, Apple said that the law, which reflects practice in the European Union, could lead to disproportionate fines for breaches that happened only in India.
The company fears that it could be fined up to US$38 billion if the global turnover calculation is used, after a CCI investigation found that it had abused its position on its app store. Apple denies the accusations.
India says change merely clarifies law
Apple accuses the competition body of illegally applying the new law retrospectively in another case.
The CCI denied this, saying it always had powers to impose a fine as high as a 10th of a company’s turnover, and the changes in the law merely clarified how it defines turnover.
“Clarificatory provisions operate retrospectively, as they explain the true intent of the legislature,” the CCI said.
In its own filing, the CCI accused Apple of trying to misguide the court, saying that despite its power to calculate penalties on the basis of global turnover, it had sought only “India-specific financial details” from Apple.
Apple disagrees, saying the turnover details sought by the watchdog in line with the new law could expose it to a much higher penalty, its court filing shows.
The Delhi High Court is set to hear the lawsuit on Jan 27. REUTERS
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
