You are here

IPS study makes case to restore CPF contribution rates

nwy_Central Provident Fund_270619_5_2x.jpg
A row of HDB bocks in Tampines on 11 January 2019.

Singapore

AN INDIVIDUAL aged 55 in 2018 would be able to save S$31,000 to S$145,000 more if the full Central Provident Fund (CPF) contribution rates are restored in the 10 years from age 55 to 64 - more than doubling his eventual CPF Life payouts.

A study by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), titled "Improving Retirement Adequacy by Restoring Older Worker CPF Rates", says a full restoration of the rates would also mean that 21,790 more workers (10 per cent of each five-year cohort) would be able to hit their full retirement sum.

"In terms of CPF Life payouts, this would mean approximately S$248 extra every month (from S$166) for the 20th income percentile (S$1,424), and S$451 extra (from S$326) for the median-income worker (S$2,867)."

sentifi.com

Market voices on:

The study favours a raising of the CPF contribution rates because it will encourage older workers to stay employed in a tight labour situation; it will also improve the adequacy of their retirement income during their autumn years.

The release of the study on Wednesday comes ahead of the government's expected changes to CPF contribution rates following a review to end by late this year.

The authors of the study are Damien Huang and Christopher Gee.

CPF contribution rates for workers above 55 years old were first cut in 1988 and again in 1993 and 1999. The combined employer-employee contribution rate of a 64-year-old today is 10.5 percentage points lower than for a 54-year-old worker.

With CPF money being used also for housing and medical needs, the study says that what is left for retirement is relatively low for the current cohorts of older workers.

CPF members are required to set aside a "minimum sum" in CPF for retirement needs at age 55. This sum is adjusted annually for inflation.

In 2016, only 53 per cent met the minimum sum required - despite a high employer-employee contribution rate of 37 per cent being in force before workers turn 55.

The IPS study quantifies the effect of full and partial restoration of CPF rates on the retirement income adequacy for workers aged 55-64 years; it also tracks the effects on employers' wage bills and the additional interest the CPF Board has to pay.

Younger workers will save more while they work and, with longer housing loan tenures, an increase in CPF contribution rates means that homeowners still paying mortgages do not have to pay additional cash out-of-pocket before they are 55.

The study says the CPF Board will pay S$54 million more in CPF interest annually with a full restoration in CPF contribution rates. A one percentage point increase in the Ordinary and Special Account will raise annual interest payments by S$9 million.

But a full restoration in CPF contribution rates will lower disposable income and raise wage bills. The study says that at the 20th percentile, disposable income will go down seven percentage points, or S$100 for the 55-59 age group and S$203 for the 60-64 group. At the 80th percentile, this goes up to S$420 and S$750 for the two age groups respectively.

The study says: "For employers, the impact is smaller than for workers, at S$57 and S$130 for groups aged 55-59 and 60-64 respectively at the 20th percentile. The smaller impact is due to the smaller initial decrease in contribution rates for employers in transiting workers from 54 to 55."

The aggregate impact on employer wage bills is likely to be around S$800 million in the first year for both age groups. The study suggests that the government soften the impact through "transitional" subsidies or phasing in the restoration of the contribution rate.

"The restoration of these rates reflects fair hiring costs to employers and are a one-time increase that can be mitigated by a phase-out subsidy," it concludes. "This solution should also be preferable to paying higher general taxes for basic pension payouts to the portion of the population who are unable to meet the CPF savings thresholds."