You are here
Malaysia trying to break up big firms without hurting stocks
MALAYSIA is considering the merits of having the state control its biggest companies, after moves to break up their dominance in sectors from the Internet to electricity led to declines in Asia's worst major stock market.
The government needs to review on a case-by-case basis whether it needs to hold on to its golden shares in state-linked firms, as the 1MDB scandal proves it is still needed, Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said on Tuesday. His administration has sought to make the companies more efficient to meet its campaign promise of lowering living costs, a drive that analysts expect to benefit the economy in the long run.
Yet Dr Mahathir walks a tightrope as he tries to overhaul state-linked firms that have stifled competition, without causing an earnings upheaval and spooking investors. The US-China trade war that triggered foreign stock outflows across Asia hasn't helped either - Malaysia's benchmark index fell 6 per cent last year, the most since 2008.
State operator Telekom Malaysia was the first hit when the country slashed broadband prices as part of an election pledge. That triggered a loss of almost US$1 billion in its market value since May 2018.
Now, power firm Tenaga Nasional is bracing itself for new players as the government moves to open up the retail electricity market. Its shares have slumped 18 per cent since September 2018, when the government first mooted the plan.
Geoffrey Ng, director at Fortress Capital Asset Management, said: "The government's push for industry-specific and procedural reforms aimed at increasing competition and transparency are for the greater good in the long-term."
It is the lack of public education and market engagement that created short-term uncertainty, which results in the perception of increased policy risk when investing in Malaysia, he added.
While Malaysians welcomed cheaper Internet and the prospect of smaller electricity bills, some of the cost may be borne by state funds Permodalan Nasional and Employees Provident Fund (EPF), which are among the biggest shareholders in the companies.
Public pension fund EPF, which owns a 16 per cent stake each in Telekom and Tenaga, said its investment income fell 7.6 per cent to 13.5 billion ringgit (S$4.46 billion) in the third quarter from a year ago due to the decline in Malaysia's stock market.
A shocked stock market
Permodalan, or PNB, announced its lowest income distribution since 1990 to unit holders of Amanah Saham Bumiputera, which owns 12 per cent of Telekom and 9 per cent of Tenaga. PNB was formed by the government in 1978 to boost the wealth of ethnic Malays and indigenous people, who buy its trusts.
Telekom shares had dropped 1.8 per cent as of the midday break in Kuala Lumpur trading, while Tenaga slid 1.1 per cent.
Alexander Chia, head of regional equity research at RHB Bank, said: "The government should be more cognisant of the impact of policy changes on publicly traded companies and service providers."
This includes consulting stakeholders and giving the market enough time to prepare for the changes "to avoid shocking the system", he added.
Representatives for the finance ministry, EPF and Telekom declined to comment, while a representative for Tenaga didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
The government should move away from the practice of using golden shares to have clout over state-owned companies, and to instead wield its influence through legislation and regulators, said Khazanah Nasional managing director Shahril Ridza Ridzuan at the same conference where Dr Mahathir spoke on Tuesday in Kuala Lumpur.
A golden share enables the government to outvote all other shareholders on certain matters, such as in appointing chief executive officers.
To be sure, the reform has pushed the companies to become leaner. Telekom cut costs by dismissing workers, renegotiating contracts and delaying capital spending.
Tenaga is splitting itself into three units, including one to handle retail electricity, and planning a debt sale for the first time since 2017 to gear up for new competition.
"GLC reforms are definitely good for the country," said Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid, the chief economist of Bank Islam Malaysia, referring to government-linked companies.
"The way I see it, the critical thing to do is to ensure that the GLCs' existence will not crowd out the private investment."
The move to open up industries dominated by state companies is also meant to encourage smaller private companies to take a bigger role in the economy. Malaysia wants small and medium-sized enterprises to contribute 50 per cent to the gross domestic product, up from 38.3 per cent in 2018.
As Dr Mahathir put it, the government has "no business to be in business".
Overall, the government's handling of the corporate reform has improved, said RHB's Mr Chia. While the broadband price cut was abrupt, the government is now communicating well and phasing in the plan to open up the electricity sector, he said.
"It was a steep learning curve, but the Pakatan Harapan government is getting better at engaging markets," he said. BLOOMBERG