You are here

Trump's trade war arrives in the data as China awaits tariffs

BP_ChinaUS_020718_45.jpg
Donald Trump's assault on trade with China is moving from tweeted threats and abortive talks to the real-world.

[HONG KONG] Donald Trump's assault on trade with China is moving from tweeted threats and abortive talks to the real-world.

Purchasing manager index readings for June released on Saturday showed a gauge of export orders tumbling into contraction, the clearest sign yet that the oncoming trade war is having a real, negative impact on growth. From this Friday, the world's two largest economies are set to begin charging higher tariffs on each other's goods, marking a major escalation of the conflict.

That's focusing minds among policy-makers in Beijing, as China now faces the tricky task of balancing support for an economy that was already slowing with its ongoing desire to curb excess credit. As the increasingly-important services sector remains robust, there's little need to open the stimulus taps too widely for now, provided the nation remains on track to hit the growth target of 6.5 per cent expansion for 2018.

"China's economy will slow down for the rest of the year, but we don't need to worry about any stall yet," said Zhu Qibing, chief macroeconomy analyst at BOC International China in Beijing. "The key is how international trade and the dispute between China and the US will evolve."

sentifi.com

Market voices on:

The manufacturing PMI stood at 51.5 in June, versus 51.9 in May, and the forecast of 51.6 in a Bloomberg survey of economists. The non-manufacturing PMI, covering services and construction, rose to 55, compared with 54.9 in May. Levels above 50 indicate improvement.

The sub-index of new export orders fell to 49.8 from 51.2, signalling weakening demand from other countries. Gauges for new orders and the backlog of orders also dropped.

The China Federation of Logistics & Purchasing, which helps conduct the PMI survey explained in a statement how merely the threat of higher duties can be having an impact on orders in advance.

"In previous months, companies expedited exports because they had foreseen this complicated situation of international trade," the federation said. "As the trade friction between United States and China escalates, exports start to ebb."

"A gauge of export orders tumbled, dropping from expansion into contraction -- a clear sign that trade-war concerns are starting to weigh on sentiment," Bloomberg economist Fielding Chen wrote. "Government policy has started tilting toward buttressing the economy."

The arrival of a bear market in the nation's leading stock exchange and the fastest slump in the currency since 2015's devaluation have already made it clear that investors are on edge. Now comes the question of how the People's Bank of China will follow through on last week's signal that they'll be more supportive of growth, and whether the current ‘structural' approach - where targeted policy tweaks aim at specific sectors, like small business - will be enough.

It's only just over a week since the last supportive PBOC move, a cut of 0.5 percentage point in the amount of reserves that banks must keep. While that move unlocked about 700 billion yuan (S$144 billion), most of those funds were targeted at supporting a complex debt-to-equity swap program that's aimed at cleaning up balance sheets.

In short, while economists forecast further cuts in the reserve ratio this year, it's not clear that they'd be directly supportive of bank credit and therefore broader economic growth. China's frothy property market and elevated corporate debt level means that simply juicing output via credit isn't as easy as it once was.

The central bank will cut the reserve ratio by another 50 basis points each quarter for the rest of 2018, according to a note from economists at Goldman Sachs Asia LLC led by Zhennan Li. The median estimate of economists surveyed by Bloomberg foresees the broader benchmark rate remaining at 4.35 per cent through year end.

"We continue to expect the PBOC to adjust its policy stance as needed to cushion any domestic growth slowdown and any materialization of trade friction," Goldman Sachs' economists wrote.

BLOOMBERG