US Senate confirms Clarida as new Federal Reserve vice-chair
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
[WASHINGTON] The US Senate on Tuesday voted to confirm economist Richard Clarida as vice-chairman of the Federal Reserve, adding the third of President Donald Trump's nominees to the central bank.
Mr Clarida, a Columbia University economist and advisor to the fund manager Pacific Investment Management Co, was confirmed by a vote of 69 to 26.
He replaces former Vice-Chairman Stanley Fischer, who stepped down in October.
In a separate vote, the Senate confirmed Clarida to fill the remainder of a 14-year term as a member of the board of governors that is due to expire in 2022.
During confirmation hearings, Mr Clarida said he supported current Fed Chairman Jerome Powell's policy of steadily raising interest rates to keep a lid on inflation as the economy grows - something that has angered Mr Trump.
But Mr Trump has had the unprecedented chance to reshape the central bank to his liking, with six of the board's seven seats either filled by Trump nominees or awaiting their confirmation.
Navigate Asia in
a new global order
Get the insights delivered to your inbox.
The Fed is widely expected to raise rates against next month and possibly again in December as the world's largest economy continues a decade of economic recovery.
Mr Clarida also served as assistant secretary of the US Treasury under former President George W. Bush.
Mr Trump tapped economist Marvin Goodfriend - whose nomination narrowly survived a committee vote in February - and Kansas banking commissioner Michelle Bowman as candidates to fill the final vacancies on the Fed board.
AFP
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Ministry of Home Affairs Permanent Secretary Pang Kin Keong to retire
Shelving S$5 billion office redevelopment plan proved ‘wise’ as geopolitical risks mount: OCBC chairman
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result