Tacit agreement that SGX's dual role is untenable
SINGAPORE'S market regulators seem to finally be in agreement with a position that The Business Times has taken for years - that having a profit-driven market regulator, one with dual roles of revenue generation and market oversight, is simply not tenable.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Singapore Exchange (SGX) issued a joint consultation paper last week, proposing some of the most extensive changes to market function and regulation to date. Not surprisingly, it caused quite a stir among market participants.
There have been murmurs of approval on how the proposals are a much-needed step in the right direction, whispers of concern from brokerages who worry about their impact on liquidity, and grumbles from those who feel these measures are long overdue.
TRENDING NOW
‘We don’t want to stay as we are’: CEO Patrick Ng builds a more resilient Huationg
URA to review guidelines on floor space to give developers more design flexibility: Chee Hong Tat
He built the Vingroup empire. Now South-east Asia’s richest man is handing some key roles to his sons
32 companies, 6 individuals bag accolades at Singapore Corporate Awards 2026