Asean Business logo
SPONSORED BYUOB logo

Gojek founder Nadiem pleads not guilty, says ‘the world felt like it was ending’ when in prison

Prosecutors demand an 18-year prison sentence and seek trillions of rupiah in restitution

Elisa Valenta
Published Tue, Jun 2, 2026 · 01:06 PM
    • Gojek founder Nadiem Makarim and his wife Franka Makarim at his plea hearing in Central Jakarta District Court on Jun 2.
    • Gojek founder Nadiem Makarim and his wife Franka Makarim at his plea hearing in Central Jakarta District Court on Jun 2. PHOTO: ELISA VALENTA

    [JAKARTA] Indonesia’s former education minister and Gojek founder Nadiem Makarim pleaded not guilty on Tuesday (Jun 2) to corruption charges over a government Chromebook procurement programme, insisting that he was wrongly accused in a high-profile case closely watched by investors and the tech sector.

    “I hope the panel can see that this is not a case of administrative error I was unaware of, or loss caused by negligence. This case has shocked many people, including me, because it is purely an investigative mistake,” said Nadiem, reading from a 13-page defence statement in Indonesian before the Central Jakarta District Court.

    Dressed in a batik shirt with blue and grey motifs, Nadiem appeared calm as he challenged the prosecution’s case, arguing that it had failed to establish state losses, unlawful conduct, personal enrichment or criminal intent.

    He said that the education ministry’s adoption of Google’s Chrome operating system had saved the state 3.9 trillion rupiah (S$279.3 million) instead of causing losses.

    “This is the central irony of this case: I face 27.5 years in prison for a policy that saved trillions in the state budget,” he said.

    Citing officials’ estimates, Nadiem said that a Windows-only laptop programme would cost 148 million rupiah per school, while a dual Chrome-Windows model would cost 98 million rupiah. “If I am found guilty, it means the state believes I should have chosen the far more expensive option.”

    Asean Intelligence

    Get insights into businesses across South-east Asia

    Get the free report

    Tuesday’s hearing was attended by family members, friends and former colleagues, while hundreds of Gojek drivers gathered outside the court in a show of support for the former minister and founder of the ride-hailing company.

    Gojek drivers gathered outside the court in a show of support for Nadiem. PHOTO: ELISA VALENTA, BT

    Nadiem also argued that the Chromebook procurement process was handled at the technical level and was not a ministerial decision, which he described as “most striking”.

    “I will say again: I agreed with the Chrome OS (operating system) policy because it demonstrably saved budget, but as a matter of administrative law, this was not a ministerial decision,” he continued.

    The case stems from the education ministry’s procurement of more than one million of Google’s Chromebook laptops during the Covid-19 pandemic as part of a broader effort to digitalise schools across Indonesia.

    Prosecutors allege that Nadiem and several former ministry officials steered the programme towards Google’s Chrome OS despite internal studies initially recommending Windows-based devices.

    Prosecutors also allege that the decision caused state losses of more than 2.18 trillion rupiah, citing what they say were inflated laptop prices and unnecessary spending on Chrome Device Management licences.

    Last month, prosecutors demanded an 18-year prison sentence for Nadiem and sought trillions of rupiah in restitution, accusing him of abusing his authority and creating a conflict of interest due to Google’s investment in Gojek, the ride-hailing company he founded before joining former president Joko Widodo’s Cabinet in 2019.

    Gojek became part of GoTo Group in 2021 after its landmark merger with giant e-commerce Tokopedia.

    The former minister denied allegations that he benefited from the procurement through his previous links to Gojek and Google, saying that Google never participated in the Chromebook procurement and that its investment in Gojek was unrelated to the education programme.

    “Google’s investment in Gojek and the Chromebook procurement are two separate, unrelated events. Yet the charges forced a connection between them,” he said.

    “The majority of Google’s investment in Gojek had already been made before I became minister, alongside dozens of other investors who also injected funds. Google was a small part of the total investment raised.”

    He added: “In the business world, an investment is not a gift that creates an obligation to repay through other means. Investors buy new shares, the company receives capital, existing shareholders are diluted. There is no debt, no quid pro quo, no obligation to reciprocate.”

    Nadiem said that he gave up all voting rights and roles at Gojek’s parent company GoTo – which is listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange – when he became minister, reducing his stake to that of a regular shareholder.

    He argued that because he no longer exercised control over the company, allegations of a conflict of interest were unfounded.

    Speaking to The Business Times before the hearing, Nadiem noted that the case had drawn close attention from global investors, and that it had raised broader questions about Indonesia’s governance and legal certainty.

    “I understand and empathise with the concerns of global investors about what is happening in Indonesia right now,” he said. “Legal certainty is one of the most important considerations for any investor.”

    He added that the involvement of GoTo and Google in the broader ecosystem had inevitably amplified scrutiny, noting that both companies are backed by major global institutional investors.

    “GoTo has some of the world’s leading institutional investors as shareholders, while Google is one of the largest technology companies globally. So naturally, it creates a degree of anxiety,” he said.

    During the hearing, the former minister became emotional as he recounted his nearly nine months in detention, his separation from his family and his recovery from multiple surgeries.

    The 41-year-old entrepreneur has been under home detention since May 12, after the court granted him permission to undergo medical treatment following health complications that required surgery.

    Speaking to the judges, he said that his condition was improving post-surgery and that he was focused on completing the legal process.

    “In the early days of my detention, the world felt like it was ending. I was alone in solitary confinement, as if simply discarded,” he said, adding that he eventually learnt to master his fear through faith.

    The court is expected to deliver its final verdict next week.

    Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

    Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.