Public opinion divided on Malaysia’s anti-graft efforts after 1MDB-related charges dropped against Najib
The ruling raises doubts about the government’s anti-corruption efforts, echoing concerns from DPM Ahmad Zahid Hamidi’s similar discharge just over a year ago
Add BT as a preferred source
[KUALA LUMPUR] The Malaysian High Court’s decision on Wednesday (Nov 27) to grant a discharge not amounting to acquittal (DNAA) to former prime minister Najib Razak and a former top treasury official in the high-profile 1MDB-related trial has reignited public debate over the country’s resolve to combat corruption.
While some Malaysians view the decision as justified, others question the attorney general’s competence and the government’s commitment in pursuing high-profile corruption cases.
According to reports, Judge Muhammad Jamil Hussin attributed the ruling to significant trial delays and the prosecution’s failure to provide complete documents.
TRENDING NOW
Indonesian court upholds earlier dismissal of 2.28 trillion rupiah claim on Keppel unit’s land
Xi Jinping has just rewritten the rules of US-China rivalry
Wilmar, Musim Mas among palm-oil firms in Indonesia under probe for suspected export under-invoicing
China traders rush for exit after cross-border flow crackdown
