Re-employment age rises to 67 from July 2017

Government pledges to continue supporting employers who re-hire above-65s voluntarily

Published Fri, Apr 8, 2016 · 09:50 PM

    DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.

    Singapore

    COME July 1, 2017, the re-employment age will be raised from 65 to 67. At the same time, the law supporting a pay-cut of up to 10 per cent for workers reaching 60 will be removed.

    Announcing these changes in Parliament, Minister of State for Manpower Sam Tan recalled that a commitment was made to raise the re-employment age at an appropriate time following the introduction of the Re-employment Act four years ago.

    And in his National Day Rally speech last year, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said the government would extend the re-employment age to 67 by 2017.

    Mr Tan said that until then, the government will continue supporting employers who voluntarily re-employ older workers beyond 65, "so the additional wage offset of 3 per cent for employers who re-employ workers above 65 will similarly be extended to July 1, 2017".

    The re-employment law will also be amended to enable a new employer to take on the re-employment obligations of a worker's original employer, if the employee agrees.

    DECODING ASIA

    Navigate Asia in
    a new global order

    Get the insights delivered to your inbox.

    The Employment Assistance Payment, given to employees when re-employment is not possible, will also be increased.

    Mr Tan said the Tripartite Guidelines on Re-employment of Older Employees has been updated and will be released soon.

    As for the removal of the law backing the pay-cut for employees reaching 60, Mr Tan said that, with flexible and performance-based wage systems now entrenched, more than 98 per cent of employers no longer reduce the wages of their workers who hit 60, "so the wage-cut provision is no longer relevant".

    The cut was introduced in 1999, when the minimum retirement age was raised to 62 and when older workers were less wage-competitive because of rigid seniority-based wages.

    Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.