Trump urges court to throw out congressional subpoena to Mazars

Published Tue, Apr 6, 2021 · 03:26 AM

    DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.

    [NEW YORK] Former President Donald Trump urged a judge to throw out a Congressional subpoena for his financial records, calling it unconstitutional and unenforceable.

    The former president asked a federal judge in Washington Monday for summary judgment - a ruling in his favor without a trial - in a House Oversight lawsuit seeking an order to force Mazars USA, Mr Trump's accounting firm, to turn over the documents.

    "The Mazars subpoena remains a demand for the president's information, based on president-specific justifications, subject to president-specific defenses,"

    Mr Trump's lawyers wrote in their request for the summary judgment. "The committee's justifications concerning the Trump Presidency cratered once he stopped being president, but the separation-of-powers concerns with these sorts of subpoenas did not."

    The fight over the subpoena reached the Supreme Court, which ruled that congressional subpoenas seeking the president's personal information must be "no broader than reasonably necessary" and ordered lower courts to determine whether the House's request met that standard.

    The Mazars dispute is only one strand of a complex series of legal battles centered on Mr Trump's tax information, which he insisted on keeping secret throughout his presidency.

    DECODING ASIA

    Navigate Asia in
    a new global order

    Get the insights delivered to your inbox.

    House Democrats are separately seeking Mr Trump's tax returns under a law that allows congressional tax committees to examine any taxpayer's filings. The Treasury Department under Trump refused to turn over the requested six years of Mr Trump's personal and business tax returns.

    Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance has obtained Mr Trump's tax records from Mazars as part of a criminal investigation into the former president's business dealings. Those documents won't be made public though unless some are presented as evidence at a trial.

    The case is Trump v. Committee on Oversight and Reform of the US House of Representatives, 19-cv-01136, US District Court, District of Columbia (Washington).

    BLOOMBERG

    Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.

    Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services