US regional banks may need to sell US$63 billion in bonds under rule
US REGIONAL banks may need to raise significant amounts of additional debt to comply with new regulatory requirements, but the extra capital might not be enough to prevent future failures, according to research published on Wednesday (Sep 6).
Eighteen regional lenders might need US$63 billion of new holding-company debt to comply with rules by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, according to a note by Bloomberg Intelligence (BI) analysts Arnold Kakuda and Nicholas Beckwith.
The regulations were drafted by the three agencies to safeguard financial institutions after a series of regional bank failures that began in March. The debt deficit of the banks – including the likes of Truist Financial, PNC Financial Services Group and M&T Bank – could climb to US$75 billion if regulators’ overhaul of Basel III is implemented, according to BI, referring to the international banking supervision group’s effort to refine its approach to capital rules.
Under the new rules, banks with US$100 billion of assets or more will need to issue enough long-term debt to cover capital losses in times of severe stress, requirements that previously only applied to bigger financial institutions. Regional banks with more than US$250 billion of assets may have a US$17 billion bail-in debt shortfall. Midsized regional banks with US$100 billion to US$250 billion of assets may also become more active debt issuers to tackle their potential debt shortfall of US$46 billion.
The rules are less onerous than previously expected, as regional companies won’t have to meet total loss-absorbing capacity requirements, which could have led to a shortfall of about US$157 billion, according to BI. Still, impacted lenders will likely need to issue more bonds to meet the new regulations, with Truist, PNC, Citizens Financial Group, M&T and First Citizens expected to lead the pack, they said.
A buffer of long-term debt like the one proposed by regulators would likely have prevented the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank earlier this year, FDIC chairman Martin Gruenberg said during a public meeting at the end of August when regulators unveiled the proposals. “The agencies believe that the presence of a substantial layer of liabilities that absorbs losses ahead of uninsured depositors could have reduced the likelihood of those depositors running,” the FDIC and Fed said in a joint notice at the time.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
However, that logic assumes depositors understand and stay up-to-date on the bank’s capital structure, CreditSights strategist Jesse Rosenthal wrote in a note.
“When panic strikes and there’s effectively zero cost for switching banks in the digital age, are fiduciaries (loosely defined) really going to take the risk?” Rosenthal wrote. “[Long-term debt] should lower the risk of uninsured depositors being locked out of their funds on the Monday after failure, but it doesn’t reduce it to zero by any stretch.”
In other words, long-term debt requirements likely would not have prevented Silicon Valley Bank from collapsing, he wrote, nor would they have a significant or lasting impact on bank liquidity. The impact of the new regulations will more likely be felt in post-failure resolution by insulating the FDIC from losses after the bank has failed, according to Rosenthal.
Truist, PNC, Citizens, M&T and First Citizens did not respond to requests for comment. BLOOMBERG
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
