Xi risks becoming top US threat if Trump cuts deal with Putin
The one major problem for Beijing is what Trump plans to do next
FOR President Xi Jinping, an end to Russia’s war in Ukraine brings many opportunities and one major threat: China would suddenly become the main focus of the US military.
US and Russian officials have started talks in Saudi Arabia to negotiate an end to the three-year war, prompting deep concern in Europe and Ukraine itself over whether Donald Trump will effectively hand a victory to Vladimir Putin. China has publicly welcomed the talks, and is positioning itself to benefit from reconstruction efforts – as well as the deepening rift among the US and its allies over the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato), the meaning of democracy and the international rules-based order.
The one major problem for Beijing is what Trump plans to do next. The comments from those around the Republican, including Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth and his eldest son Donald Trump Jr, indicate the US wants to focus the bulk of its military assets on countering China.
“Beijing is in a Catch-22 situation,” said John Gong, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing who has worked as a consultant for China’s Commerce Ministry. “It wants the war to stop, or at least be suspended,” he added. “But it’s not so much interested in becoming the No 1 priority issue for Washington.”
China has, so far, avoided any action that might provoke Trump, responding to his 10 per cent tariff with modest moves and refraining from the aggressive “Wolf Warrior” diplomacy rolled out in his first term. Xi is instead focused on the economy, which is battling a yearslong property crash, sticky deflation and sluggish consumption. The Chinese leader met Alibaba’s once-shunned Jack Ma this week to close a chapter on regulatory crackdowns and boost animal spirits as Beijing prepares to unveil its annual growth goal next month.
Trump himself has struck a less belligerent tone on China, telling reporters on Wednesday (Feb 19) that a trade deal was “possible” and again trumpeting his “very good relationship” with Xi. But his administration is stacked with China hawks, including Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has pledged to address Beijing’s “destabilising actions” in the South China Sea.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
China would be sensitive to any stepped-up attention over its actions in the Indo-Pacific, where it has territorial disputes with the Philippines as well as self-ruled Taiwan. Beijing previously accused the US of trying to build a Pacific version of Nato, as the Biden administration strengthened security alliances with Japan and South Korea.
Displaying its ambition to project military power across Asia-Pacific, the Chinese navy this week has three warships sailing in international waters off the coast of Sydney in a voyage the Australian defence minister branded “unusual”.
Indicating Trump’s team could already be taking a stronger stance in Asia, the US State Department this month deleted a phrase from a fact sheet saying the US does “not support Taiwan independence” – a line Beijing frequently demands nations it has diplomatic ties with endorse. It was unclear if the change was intentional, and the US maintained it endorsed its long-standing “one-China policy”.
Taiwan is keeping a close eye on the latest developments, as Trump warns Volodymyr Zelensky that if Ukraine does not strike a deal quickly with Russia then “he is not going to have a Country left”. His administration has also signalled sanctions relief for Russia could be on the table.
One diplomat from the self-governing island, which China claims as its own, said although relations between Russia and the US will improve, the most important thing for Taiwan is to prove its value to Trump.
The twist for Taipei – and Beijing – is that Trump’s own policy can differ from that of his cabinet. On the campaign trail, the Republican demanded Taiwan pay the US for security and cast doubt over former President Joe Biden’s repeated pledge to defend the island from China.
While there’s no indication Xi plans to invade anytime soon, a softer stance from Taipei’s biggest military backer could make it more vulnerable to pressure campaigns from Beijing.
Another scenario could see China participate in a Trump-led Ukraine deal. The US leader has floated the possibility of a three-way meeting with Putin and Xi, in which he suggested they’d agree to cut defence spending in half – an idea Beijing swiftly rejected.
What China could offer Ukraine remains unclear. Defense Secretary Hegseth has said the American military would not be deployed, and any “security guarantee must be backed by capable European and non-European troops”. That leaves the door open to some kind of United Nations peacekeeping force, which could include Chinese troops, although a direct dispatch from China cannot be ruled out.
Beijing could play a “leading role” with Global South and non-Nato countries in peacekeeping, according to Zhou Bo, a retired senior colonel in the People’s Liberation Army and senior fellow at Tsinghua University’s Center for International Security and Strategy. “Being China’s first ever direct involvement in the security of Europe, it would promote China’s image and boost its international standing,” he added.
China’s Foreign Ministry has declined to comment on whether Beijing would participate in any such mission when asked at regular briefings.
A cessation of hostilities in Ukraine also presents Beijing with a “rare opportunity” to repair its damaged relations with Europe, according to Yu Jie, a senior research fellow on China at Chatham House.
Beijing could offer assistance in reconstructing Ukraine, leveraging its vast experience building infrastructure abroad through extending cheap credit under its US$1 trillion Belt and Road initiative. China signalled its willingness for such efforts in a 2023 position paper on the conflict, saying: “China stands ready to provide assistance and play a constructive role in this endeavour.”
Inserting its military and money into Ukraine’s peace process could complicate Xi’s “no limits” relationship with Putin, if Moscow launched another invasion. There’s little sign recent developments between Russia and the US would fracture those ties, with Xi planning a visit to Moscow in May.
Facing a fickle US leader in Trump, China is more likely to play the long game, according to Alexander Gabuev, director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. After all, barring any health issues, Putin is able to stay in the Kremlin until at least 2036, probably far outlasting Trump.
“Why would you sacrifice a relationship with a strategic partner who will be around for as long as you can see for somebody who changes his mind all the time and who is not trustworthy?” he added. BLOOMBERG
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
