A space movie that raises interesting ethical issues
It has a provocative premise also, but Passengers ends up feeling bland and uninspired.
MOVIES set in outer space have been de rigueur in recent years, and their narratives typically have something in common: human beings in distress. If it's not one thing, like being stranded in space (Gravity, 2013) or on a distant planet (The Martian, 2015), it's another, like having to locate a new home for the human race (Interstellar, 2014).
This year's entry in the sci-fi space stakes is a film about an ultra-long trip undertaken by an interplanetary traveller who's lost and alone despite being on a spaceship with 5,000 people on board. Instead of boldly going where no man has gone before, Passengers is about journeying to a place where lots of people have already been.
Since earth is overpriced and overrated, life on a faraway colony seems like an attractive alternative. The only snag is that travelling there aboard the Starship Avalon takes 120 years. Thanks to advances in medical science, the price of a ticket includes a high-tech sleeping pod and a long session in suspended animation, with passengers woken up a few months from their destination: a cozy development named Homestead II where - like the bar in Cheers - everybody knows your name.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.