A US judge rejected World Wrestling Entertainment’s (WWE) effort to dismiss a smaller rival’s antitrust lawsuit that accused it of monopolising the market for professional wrestling media rights.

In a decision on Thursday (Jun 15), US district judge Edward Davila in San Jose, California, said MLW Media had presented enough “circumstantial” evidence that WWE uses its dominance to keep rivals from accessing various distributors and arenas.

MLW said Stamford, Connecticut-based WWE commands about 92 per cent of revenue from US media rights for pro wrestling, versus 6 per cent for All Elite Wrestling and less than 2 per cent for everyone else.

The Mamaroneck, New York-based plaintiff also cited WWE’s exclusive rights agreements with Fox and Comcast’s NBCUniversal, which run major cable networks, and said WWE blocks rivals from NBC’s streaming platform Peacock.

MLW sufficiently alleged that WWE’s activities “had a substantial effect in foreclosing competitors from the professional wrestling media rights market,” Davila wrote.

WWE and its lawyers did not immediately respond on Friday to requests for comment.

A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU

Friday, 2 pm

Lifestyle

Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself.

Sign Up

Marc Kasowitz, a lawyer for MLW, in a statement said the company looked forward to recovering “substantial” damages for WWE’s “many years of egregious anticompetitive behaviour.” The lawsuit began in January 2022.

In seeking a dismissal, WWE had said wrestling promoters “have all the tools needed to succeed” and that MLW could sign up with other channels and platforms, including those run by Amazon.com, CBS, Disney, Netflix and Warner Bros Discovery. REUTERS